My Video Went Viral. Here’s Why

Now, you may have seen this thumbnail on YouTube. I mean, I can actually basically guarantee that YouTube has been shoving this in your face like, “Click! Click! Click it again!” So you might be wondering why. Why did this video in particular go viral? Well, that is what I’m gonna set out to explain in this video but I’m gonna start with something that seems unrelated, which is YouTuber burnout. Now, there’s no secret, there have been a lot of YouTubers recently talking about burnout: people like Casey Neistat, Superwoman, Ryan Higa, Grace Helbig, and many, many, MANY more, and I think, when you have all of these people with different YouTube channels, different experiences, they’re all saying something similar; I think it’s worth understanding that there may be sort of a common factor at play amongst all of them. So what I’m actually gonna present is a kind of theory of everything when it comes to YouTube; everything from YouTuber burnout, through to videos going viral; why do videos go viral on the platform right now. Okay, so, you know, I think as a viewer your response to burnout might be to say, “Well these YouTubers are just entitled” or, “They’re soft” or, you know, “Boohoo, you have the best job in the world” or your other response might be that burnout happens in every industry, so why should we care about this YouTuber thing, but I think that YouTuber burnout is a more specific phenomenon; I think there’s something particular going on here. and it all starts with the YouTuber life cycle. I mean, if you think about a YouTuber who’s complaining about burnout, you know they’ve had some success on the platform where their views are rising – and of course that’s exhilarating, it feels great and you’re working pretty hard, but you’re seeing it pay off, and then at some point your views start to falter so maybe you work a little bit harder but things don’t really change and-and the views, you know, continue to fall. I think there’s a certain thing to do with the psychology of anchoring here. You know, once you have a certain number of subscribers, then, you know, a hundred thousand views which might be amazing in the beginning feels like a horrible disappointment. So there’s a real problem between sort of expectations and reality, and to me, this is a big part of why YouTuber burnout happens. Now, if you look at what the YouTubers are saying about this, you find that a lot of them are taking responsibility themselves, and they’re also making some clear cause-and-effect relationships, which you know this kind of seemed to make sense: okay, so this idea we assume that views reflect something about video quality, we kind of make that assumption, and so when there are, you know, fewer views taking place, that means the video is lower quality. This is just kind of, I think, instinctive, but I want to question that. I also want to question these YouTubers who essentially put the blame on themselves and say, you know, they’re just not making as good videos anymore to me I think there’s something else at play, and it is the system. So, from time to time, I like to go over to Google Trends, where you can basically search any search term and see how much traffic there is, how many people are searching that term at any given time, and if you search for “Veritasium” basically since 2004 you see, well, this kind of curve, which might make you ask the question: “Where on the YouTuber life cycle do you think I am?”, and of course this little spike here is from my black hole videos, this over here must be some Harry Potter fans who are bad at spelling. So this is how much people are searching for me, which I think kind of correlates to how much my videos are being shown on YouTube, and how much people are watching them and enjoying them. Now let’s look at a similar channel for comparison. How about the channel Numberphile? It’s also an educational channel, but it’s, uh, you know, very diff- made by very different people with very different schedules, very different topics that we’ve tackled, and yet these graphs look pretty similar, Uhh, let me have a look at one more. So this is the AsapSCIENCE curve. So here you have Veritasium, Numberphile, and AsapSCIENCE: three educational YouTube channels, which all follow a fairly similar pattern on Google Trends. So my question is: You know, why is this? Why should we follow a similar trend? Well, the obvious answer is the algorithm. And the algorithm has a very important job, because in traditional media, there are not that many works produced. I mean, in American theaters last year, there were about 800 films. 800 films. That’s it. On TV there were 500 scripted TV shows. But when it comes to YouTube, it doesn’t even compare. I mean, I don’t even think that they advertise the number of hundreds of hours uploaded every minute. The obvious analogy is that you’re really just seeing the tip of the iceberg, but in the case of icebergs, you see, you know, almost 10% of the ice above the surface. In the case of YouTube you’re seeing just (the tip of)x5 of the iceberg basically, statistically speaking, you are ignorant of everything on YouTube. And yet, YouTube claims that they have this algorithm, which you can think of, like, the brain of the platform that can connect an audience (that knows almost nothing of what’s on the platform), to the particular types of content they like. And in the best case, they would argue, YouTube would argue, that the algorithm is basically the audience. You know, the audience decides what they want to watch and-and the algorithm is just reflecting that, but of course, we are not in this ideal world, and the audience itself is always kind of shifting and changing who they are and what they like to watch, and so, the algorithm, you can think of as following the audience the algorithm is-is chasing this audience around and trying to reach them. Now, what YouTube doesn’t much consider, is that well, the YouTube creators use their content to try to chase the algorithm. So these YouTubers who would love to be creating content about, you know, whatever they’re most passionate about in whatever way they also see what’s popular on the site and they try to make content that will please the algorithm. And so there’s a way in which the content is chasing the algorithm, the algorithm is chasing the audience, and if the content actually manages to catch up with the algorithm, you get a-a kind of perverse situation, in which the algorithm is the content. I mean, what do I mean by that? Just a crazy thought experiment: if YouTube wanted more videos of snails, they could make that happen; they don’t actually have to go out and make any snail videos, if they just, you know, promoted videos with snail in the title, tomorrow there’s gonna be a whole bunch on the front page and trending and then creators be like, “Oh snails are the new thing!”, and they’re going to go make a bunch of videos about snails. YouTube would love to believe that-that creators don’t care about the algorithm – but they do! It’s like the core aspect of how creators decide what content to make. Just as a more, uh, down-to-earth example, I can show you a graph of the length of my videos from 2011, through to today. And what you see is, at the beginning, uh, all of my videos averaged about 2 or 3 minutes in length, but these days, I’m fast approaching an average length of video of 10 minutes. Now, YouTube never came to me and said, “Derek, you have to make longer videos”; all they said was, well videos that are longer and get longer watch time will be promoted more on the site, so, people like myself and, you know, all the other creators who wanted to be seen, we made longer videos. It’s just, what we did. Now, we know that the algorithm is always changing; they’re always trying to optimize it make it work better, but they also change what it’s trying to optimize for. In the beginning it was simple: just views, but they quickly figured out that, of course, like, a 20 minute view is worth a lot more than a 5 second view, so the actual metric should be watch time. And this, uh, was advantageous to people like gamers, because people like to watch people play video games for long periods of time. They also reduced the latency of the algorithm, by which I mean it updates every 10 minutes instead of, say, every day, and that’s beneficial for news content and things that are really time-sensitive, and to me as a YouTuber what this means is it’s impossible to be an expert on YouTube. If you look at what it takes to become an expert at anything, according to the Nobel prize-winning economist Daniel Kahneman, you need, of course, many, many hours of practice. Effortful, deliberate practice. And on YouTube I would argue we get that. You also need timely feedback, and, again, on YouTube we’re given plenty of tools to be able to see how our videos are performing; but, when it comes to a reliable environment – this is an environment in which the rules of the game aren’t changing: so you can think of something like chess it’s possible to be a chess expert, because in the middle of a game of chess, the rules don’t suddenly change on you. Now, on YouTube, that is not true. We are not playing by the same rules the whole time, because the algorithm is constantly changing. And so, that puts us in this position, where it’s kind of impossible to be experts, and instead we’re a little bit more like [page flips], caged pigeons. Okay, go with me on this. Uh, there was this famous experiment where, you know, pigeons were put in a cage with a lever and if they push the lever then they would get some food, and so they very quickly learned that they needed to push the lever and the food would come out, so that’s fine. But in a another part of the experiment they disconnected, the lever from the food output and they just supplied food into the cage, kind of, at random and what did the pigeons do? Well, they started to do the types of behaviors that they were doing when the food appeared, so, if one was preening itself then it would keep preening itself, with the expectation that food was coming, and this one, maybe he was pecking the ground; so, the point being they started to engage in these superstitious behaviors, um, because they had related some sort of cause and effect, but there actually wasn’t a cause and effect there, and to me, this partly explains the whole YouTube burnout phenomenon, because you have these creators who are stretching themselves to try to chase that algorithm meanwhile the algorithm is constantly shifting and so you never feel like an expert and never quite know what’s going on even though you’re constantly trying to relate cause and effect now I can understand why the algorithm has to change. I mean in the early days of YouTube, it was this situation where if you had subscribers you were golden because the next time you uploaded some content then YouTube would show it to all your subscribers it’ll get a ton of views YouTube would say “oh this is a popular video”, show it to even more people, getting you even more subscribers so the next time you launch another video then it goes to more subscribers more views and it was just this positive feedback loop where you would grow and grow and grow a channel so the rich got richer and small channels stayed small so obviously we needed something to break the cycle and so YouTube started doing some experiments where they would essentially change what was recommended to your audience so they would stop showing some of the content from certain subscribers and they saw what happened to views so they started disconnecting these subscribers from the channel No longer was a subscription like “I want to see every video by this person” it was more of a suggestion that maybe something this person creates is something I might like to see and what YouTube found when they did that was that the number of views on the platform the amount of watch time all rose dramatically so for YouTube to get growth of the site they found that reducing the importance of subscriptions was essential and this kind of makes sense if you think about it I mean if you make one great video, that doesn’t necessarily mean that every video you’re gonna make is gonna be great so it makes sense for YouTube to step in and play some role in terms of determining what gets shown to which audience members Now, as has been observed by MatPat previously, moving away from subscriptions moves YouTube back to what it was like to sell newspapers on the street you really had to inspire people to buy on the spot you have to serve up really sensational news items. This is also called yellow journalism. it was only once the newspapers built subscription models that newspapers could make sober journalism a reality, something that they focused on because they already had your eyeballs, they didn’t have to fight for that sort of attention they didn’t have to be as sensational but YouTube is going in the opposite direction reducing the importance of subscribers means increasing the importance of sensationalism and click-baity thumbnails and so a few weeks ago I was out at the creator summit in New York and I met MrBeast. I showed him some of the footage from this video I was working on about the shade balls in LA Reservoir and MrBeast took one look at it, and he said to me that’s a banger which I think it’s pretty funny but I think clearly he knew that this was going to be a video that would take off and we talked about titles and thumbnails you might have noticed that the thumbnail borrows a bit from say his work with cereal and Orbeez in backyards and I told him that I was thinking about calling it something like, Throwing Shade Balls and he was like, “No”. He suggested, why are there 96 million black balls on this lake Now I changed it to reservoir because I mean let’s be real that’s what it is but it just goes to show how important the title and thumbnail are what I learned talking to MrBeast was that going viral you can boil down to two metrics: you need to do two things with your video in order for it to go viral and I mean tens of millions of views as his channel shows Okay the first thing, maybe not surprising, is watch time. so when people click on your video they actually have to watch a significant portion of it It’s useful if that’s sort of seven or eight minutes now that is the actual time that they watch, so you need a longer video than that, say 15 minutes, if you want the average watch time to be around that 7 or 8 minute mark Now for me, watch time is not that exciting of a metric to know that I have to hit because I know that most people already watch most of my videos so for me the big insight came with number two if you want a viral video you need to have a high click-through rate so that is the total number of clicks on your titles and thumbnails divided by the number of times that title and thumbnail have been shown that is your click-through rate and MrBeast showed me this graph showing that as you approach 10% 20% 30% click-through rate then the number of views and the number of impressions that video will get Just skyrockets. It jumps dramatically now on the one hand that kind of makes sense because you know people are clicking a video obviously you’re going to get more views but it is such a dramatic increase that it really turns the site into a place where the title and thumbnail are everything you can have a great video but unless you have a great hook to get people in it’s not going to go viral and so it was amazing to hear all these different YouTubers talk about how they optimized a thumbnail many people told me that when they were working on a thumbnail for a new video they would actually Photoshop it onto a screenshot of their current YouTube home screen in various positions and just see how eye catching it was they’re really working hard to make these thumbnails as clickable as possible it’s like weaponizing the thumbnail and that arms race is only set to increase with the introduction of real-time click-through rate which is coming out in a month or two so what you can bet will happen is that creators will launch a video and then they’ll be sitting there with all these different variants of thumbnails and they’ll be swapping them out and looking at what that does to click-through rate and then going with the one that leads to the greatest click-through rate and you can imagine, if you don’t do this, you’re gonna be left behind because all the other creators are sitting there swapping their thumbnails to get the highest engagement that they possibly can on their videos and if you’re not doing that, then your videos will end up getting buried So, acknowledging that this is the reality of YouTube I want to outline to you my plan for what I will do going forward First and foremost, I want to keep making high-quality videos because if I don’t do that I’m not going to be happy I won’t be satisfied and neither will you but second of all I’m gonna have to choose topics that are more clickable because frankly if I’m going to work for days and weeks and months on a video I would like that video to get say 10 million views instead of half a million so a lot of that comes down to “is this topic clickable” and so or number three I’m gonna have to use some clickbaity titles and thumbnails and I apologize for that but it just seems like it’s an existential threat that if you don’t do that your channel will not be around for very long and you’ll be on that sort of downward slide I’d love to know what you think, If you think it’s a good idea a bad idea I’m totally open to hearing you out CaseyNeistat talked about how he’s got to trust his audience, you know to come back to him the truth is, the audience only knows you’re there if they see your titles and thumbnails I went to buy something at B&H a little while ago, and the guy was like “oh hey I love your videos!” and then he said, “are you still making them?” and I was like, “yeah yeah I’m making them. How do you not know?” and I also see comments on my videos where people are like, “oh great here’s a veritasium video see you again in six months” but I’m like, “no I’m making these every week, every other week, like I’m making them you just got to know that they’re here but you can only know that they’re there if they surface to the tip of the tip of the tip of the tip of the iceberg which now is a click-through rate game On the one hand, you could be a little bit disappointed by the way the game is working right now but on the other hand I challenge you to think of a better way because they have this limited real estate in which to show people potential videos they might be interested in and of course they want to put the videos there that people are most likely to click and then most likely to watch once they’ve clicked it and like part of me is like, yeah I guess that’s kind of fair would you make the argument that you should put some videos there that people are less likely to click? No. I mean, that doesn’t seem to make any sense. so I kind of feel like this is the inevitable, rational endpoint for any algorithm that is trying to optimize what people are watching we want to give you the things that you want to watch and you indicate your desire by clicking on them but by doing that it also means that things that are just less catchy, less sensational don’t rise into this level here and I wonder more broadly, how does that affect us? How does that affect the YouTube platform? if the YouTube platform becomes a real clickbait site Who wants to go there? What types of audience will come there? Will there even be an audience for educational content? I think it’s all these decisions about the system and the algorithm that determine what the actual media looks like what content is created what people come to the site what audiences are served there And I think this is a broader issue than just YouTube. I mean, everywhere now we can be served the things that we you really want. but what does that world look like? I mean you might have thought it would be this utopia but I would argue that it’s not. because it silences all these voices that you would otherwise get you know in a more curated marketplace if you’re just going for the things that drive the clicks That is a very skewed view on the world and I’m not sure it’s for the best But there is one way on YouTube at least to short-circuit this effect and it is to ring that bell and you’re like, “oh the whole point of this video is to get to this point and tell you to ring the bell!” I mean, no, if you want to ring the bell, I encourage you to do that now because I feel like I never encouraged people to subscribe or ring the bell on this channel because it seems needy and I think you can do whatever you want, whenever you want it but in this ecosystem where click-through rate is king, where millions of black balls on a reservoir is the thing that is going to rise to the surface, the only way to get around that is to have people who are notified every time I make something so I want you to think about the videos that I’ve made you know in the past and so far this year and think about do you want to know about every single one of those? and if you do then I encourage you to click the bell and the more people who do that, the less I will be driven to make clickbaity titles and thumbnails and videos because I’ll know that I can reach my audience without having to appeal to, you know, the basest instincts of people So, if you want to see more of what I’m doing, click to subscribe, ring the bell and if you don’t then please you know unsubscribe because it’s good to give YouTube as clear of signals as possible but I think there is a bit of hope for the future because what I’ve described is the way YouTube appears to be working right now but I think that, well we know that the algorithm is always shifting and what I’ve heard is that the direction YouTube wants to go is optimizing for long term, satisfied, watch time That’s got three pieces. You have to look at, are people coming back time after time If they watch someone’s videos do they come back time after time for months That would be one signal. Are they watching for a long period of time? That’s also a sign that people are enjoying it And finally, there’s the satisfied piece. Are people satisfied by the things that they’ve seen? This is a new metric to add in And how do you really gauge satisfaction? Well, YouTube is experimenting with surveys. Surveys just like this one. and they will hopefully allow us to come to a different place where the algorithm isn’t just about click-through rate and watch time but it’s also about satisfaction. How much you’re driven to come back How much you really love the content. So my great hope is if we move in this direction there may be a time in the future where click-through rate is no longer king I’d love to know what you think so let me know down in the comments and I’m gonna jump straight into end screen here I’m going to post a few thumbnails for videos that are not particularly a click-baity so feel free to click these. I mean you’re gonna look at them and be like, “I don’t want to click that” but that’s exactly the point. these are apparently good videos that maybe just aren’t as catchy in terms of titles and thumbnails If you want to subscribe you can click up here and thanks for listening to the rant that I’ve given many times to whoever will listen

100 thoughts on “My Video Went Viral. Here’s Why

  • The thing is, when you or Scishow or Vsauce and such channels utilize click bait style titles and thumbnails, we catch the bait because we know that the video will not only live up to the expectation, but it will actually surpass it by providing much more interesting material than what was hinted at in the title. Because of the good quality of the content, your niche audience will stick around and generate views and won't be pushed away by the catchy titles which bring up extra views from other audiences.

  • I just clicked the bell, very interesting video. For the record yours is a channel I regularly browse to manually, to catch your latest uploads. I enjoy the content you make and I hope you continue to be successful on the platform, even if clickbaity thumbnails and titles is how you do it

  • The way I see it it is that clickbaity thumbnails and titles are acceptable if the videos are of good quality.

  • I like the channel and I always click on Veritasium to see new videos and old ones since `I only subscribed this year. I have also clicked on the notification bell. I mostly don't comment on Videos unless I am compelled by the Host of the Channel and since it's YouTube you can say that I have many Channels that I am currently subscribed to and which I enjoy watching all the time. Why are 96,000,000 black balls video, was the first Video I saw of this channel and I was instantly hooked. You are doing a great job and I am behind you. From Nairobi, Kenya.

  • I'm sure this has already been said, but nice job with the paper presentation in video form. And, of course, this is a great presentation, and I agree with all the points that are being made.

  • I myself keep a list outside of yt of the channels i like. I don t trust yt with their lists, and also lets me keep an alternate channel for that creator on another platform, lest yt decides it will kill the channel. i keep the list on my desktop and run thru it to make sure i am hitting my favorite youtubers often enough, since the bell cannot be relied on either. In political or similar videos, even the subscription will disappear, regardless of how many times i resubscribe. You make great videos, your personality is really suited for what you do, all success to you and thank you for all the great stuff I have learned thru you.

  • He figured it out! Not only is Google powered by pigeons (, but YouTube is as well.

  • I completely turned off all notifications. It generates huge amounts of spam email and all the new video notifications I was getting were for videos I'd watched days before. Further, it doesn't seem to affect the recommendations at all.

  • Thats the most relatable and informative video I have ever watched. I would like to bring to your notice that many youtubers are making videos based on a particular or niche audience. I guess that can be one thing to consider to break the algorithm. Also this particular audience can be of a particular hemisphere where there is more population. ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • words words words words, how long can I possibly make this video longer? I got it! words words words words words words words words words words words words, click like click like clicked like clicked like clicked like clicked like clicked like. Thank you

  • If you have subscribed to a lot of channels, the bell doesn't work as it should any more.
    That is – if you get notifications, but you begin to select, because there is simply not enough time to watch them all – that's the time the notifications of the ones you haven't watched, starts to not show up any more.

  • So one insight I would add to your message, even when you subscribe, you get a notification in your gmail under the 'social' tab. For me at least that is a tab i almost never check, so all new videos coming in from all my subscribed chans get packed up in there and once in a while i go in and see a list of unread mail for each new vid that came out in the past days/weeks. Just something to think about … Keep up the good work ! (Is that really your handwriting on the posters ?)

  • YouTubers are fueled by algorithms not people.

    Edit: HOLY MOLY I did not read any of the description before writing that, wow he said the same thing!

  • As long as u donโ€™t compromise on the quality and not strive away from educational content u can count me to be a regular viewer. But I do want to talk about oversaturated content being shown. When the black hole image was released it was all the rage and I saw just too much of that, to the point I havenโ€™t watched urs yet. What will be interesting to know is whether the yt algorithm will figure this out as well๐Ÿ˜ถ

  • The way that he worded his presentation and the visuals that went along with it, in and of themselves deserve to be a Ted talk.

  • I've been watching your videos here and there for years, and I'm subscribing today (and ringing the bell) because of your open honesty. Great video.

  • Derek, the reason why I choose to watch your videos is that I learn a lot from listening to you, and what really helps is the videos have closed captions. A video without closed captions turns me away, and I am eager to learn new things. SmarterEveryday, CuriousDriod and your videos provides that, and it makes me want to stay with you. I honestly am not interested in Click Rate. I am very interested in high quality videos that educate us with truth, instead of bias views. Clicking the bell is one thing that I will start doing if I want to keep seeing your videos.

    Great presentation, by the way!

  • The portion you explained around 12:30 is why we have CLICKBAIT on YouTube. These are people who dangle lures in front of viewers, then you find out when you click it, it isnโ€™t what they promised.

  • Thumbs up if that black ball video is at the top of the videos in your suggestion column on the right ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ It is on mine!

  • It's pretty special that you are able to explain these specific cases so well! Probably a lot of people clicked on this video through that viral video that was mentioned at the beginning. I am also trying hard to understand why my videos are not getting enough engagement even though I thought I was doing fine. 10 videos but 85 subs on my channel: I think I'm doing quite bad! What about you guys? How many subs do you guys have after uploading 10 videos?

  • bell ringing is a big commitment. it puts a new videos next to phone calls/texts from my friends & family members. for most channels i follow, i use the subscriptions tab

  • I like your work, YouTube should do something more for educational channels to give them more audience than others,

  • I read the title of the vid out loud in class once (sorta talking to myself) and my Maths teacher answered it really well and I was like wtf he's smart turned out he'd watched the exact vid lmao

  • *** for this video ๐Ÿ˜€ NOT just a thumbs up!

    Also here's an idea for YouTube, on that "real estate" have the top 3 being "subscribed videos" and the bottom 3 being "suggested videos" and the "subscribed videos become ranked based on "watch time", "number watched", "number/length of comments", "time since last upload by creator", & "thumbs up average" (or average star rating when they bring that in) (other metrics may also be useful!!

  • LOVED EVERY MINUTE OF THIS VIDEO. it's an increbly useful and interesting video. Thank you so much for eductating us. Please keep going. It does suggest a question of how driven ppl are to be educated. And maybe also how can YT offer a space 'to grow' and not through everything in the same basket, CTRy crap and great vids like this.

  • I think there are still a lot of very curious people, people who wants to learn about world around them in the way that you do it. So i say, keep doing what you doing, and fans will stay and new will come. This is no Logan Paul "crazy" channel, this is smart, clever, intelectual stimulating science/educational channel that fans (WE) really appreciate ! Keep up the amazing work sir ! No CTR will stop us in finding your videos ๐Ÿ˜€

  • I spend more time deleting recomendations than watching videos recently.
    You watch a single video a the algo spams the f_ck upon you with hundrets of copies or videos from the same channel as if beeing interested in a video means I'm interested in the whole channel.

  • You could have a explore part of your home page that shows things on the fringes. You could also have a audience filter where the audience chose what type videos they want to watch at the time they log in. Say educational or games movies etc

  • I have watched you for years. I have never subscribed to any channel. I watched this video to the end, and have subscribed.
    I want to tell you a couple thoughts I had while watching this video.

    I wondered if CTR was when people click through the adds.
    I asked this because now I wonder what the percentage is of people that pay for RED, so they don't have commercials.

    I wanted to tell you how I don't feel 'in my scenario' that the click baitieness applies to me.
    I know most people don't do what I do, but here it goes.
    I have favorites to the channels I like….. HOWEVER… not to the channels homepage.
    It's to the 'videos' section which sorts by newest.
    I do this because I already know that I like the channel. And I just want to continue where I left off to get caught up on your content.
    I feel the 'algorithm' doesn't work in my scenario; at least not the part that would lead me here.

    You have a great channel!!!


  • Great vid! After I watched it youtube launched another vid on its own algorithm. Splendid! ๐Ÿ™‚
    That clickbaity trend is a very sad. Ansewring your questions what would I do to propose best content in a limited space: I'd significantly increase rank value of videos that have low CRT, but high likes to watches ratio and add a system incentive to click it. That's a simple solution.
    Another way to shortcircuit the system is use primarily subscriptions page instead of the main page or trending page. The bells are not really necessary.

  • The problem with clickbaity links, not just on YouTube, but on websites too, is that the content often disappoints the expectations. This has caused me to ignore a lot of videos/articles that I would have clicked on in years past. I am a fan of the notifications button.

  • This is a glimpse into this is how we get manufactured consent, even beyond youtube and other SM. A very serious problem when the content goes beyond snails.

  • I don't know what you mean by the fact that subscribers don't see all of your content? All of their videos come up on the subscription tab, and that is all that I use. Are you taking about the reccomended section? Because that is supposed to expose you to non subscribed channels so that you can try new content.

  • i want you to hear out my opinion… I'd like to first describe the way youtubers are making money and second explain how can it be better from my point of view. the likes and views are a direct indicators of the algorithm and that sucks because i know for myself that there are videos that i like more and videos that i like less but… im not gonna dislike noooo because why would i hurt a person why should i cause him to lose money just because i liked it less not even disliked it… i think the like system is very broken and if manipulated correctly can end this dumb algorithm cycle that creators are having. spotify has an algorithm as well… their algorithm is simply better. why? because they dont care if the audience are listening or not, they care if they like what they're hearing. i think that it can be utilized in such a way that will provide creators a better chance at thriving in this platform.

  • I am a long-time subscriber of your channel and love your work, so first I'd like to say "GOOD JOB and PLEASE KEEP UP". Your way of thinking and energy is inspiring.

    I agree with you on the fact that, like on any other entertainment platform, creators have to not only to make genuine and sincere content but also have to spend a lot of energy to promote it.
    But most people do not know how to use Youtube and see it as a simple video platform because they do not take time to connect to creators and simple eat up recommended content.

    This video looks like a tutorial for YouTubers for getting views by explaining how the platform works. But I think it is the viewers that need a tutorial for learning how to use Youtube.
    Connecting to YouTubers, getting to know them and their center of interest, subscribing and unsubscribing is time-consuming but it is what it takes to make a Youtube account live.
    The pretty look of a thumbnail should only necessary for people that do not know a Youtuber yet and be a gateway to subscribing or not to their channel.

    I have never seen a video that talks about what is Youtube and how to use it. Depending on how one uses it, it can be a repulsive bunch of nonsense videos or it can be a personal platform that keeps the viewer informed of what is up in their center of interest and what would be great to discover.
    How much time is someone willing to spend time with another person? It depends on the affinity, and the more it is strong, the more effort one is going to put into the relationship.

  • Free Taco ๐ŸŒฎ when you ring the bell ๐Ÿ””

    Clickbait channels suck

    That was a great ๐Ÿ‘ presentation thanks

    Instagram โœจ๐Ÿ‘ฝ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฆโœจ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

    Sukit ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿ˜น

  • Holy shoot, just found out I'm (inexplicably) not subscribed to Veritasium. I feel confident that I've already subscribed here. WTF

  • This was an amazing video! I now realize why the bell is so important for those channels that you really like!

  • I don't think your titles are clickbait. That term is often misunderstood and misused. Clickbait is when the title is misleading and overly sensational with little content related to it (or garbage content) in the actual video or article. But if the content is good, then it doesn't matter how "clickbait-ey" the title is.

  • Thank you for creating this video. I've not only rang the bell on your channel, but MANY others as well. Truthfully, your concerns as a creator on YouTube have been my concerns as a consumer. I genuinely want to see every video you, and many others, post. As soon as subscriptions became NOT that, I began enjoying YouTube a little less. However, up until this video was created, I believed that ringing the bell was a nuisance. But now… Now I'm really enjoying this bell feature and have essentially rang the bell on all of my subscriptions because I value the content they provide.

    Long story short… THANK YOU!

  • Please, make a video about The New York Times' coverage of the influence of YouTube in Brazil right-wing politics:

    I love your videos. Thank you!

  • "Thanks for listening to the rant that I've given many times to whoever will listen." – This last sentence hits hard man! I've gone on a few rants about this and other topics to whoever will listen. My mom could start a Youtube consulting service after having to hear all the rants that were forced upon her

  • who is here by 2am in the morning trying to double their youtube hustle like me?. Comment down below๐Ÿ‘‡. You can also sub scribe to my channel if you think my video is helpful

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *